From f11bbbef0c72e9141a9fbe6d3b9bf1d3154f104c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Seitz <stephan.seitz@fau.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:57:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Bugfix: TypedSymbol.is_negative should not be implemented in
terms of super().is_positive
This can lead to surprising simplifications
---
pystencils/data_types.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pystencils/data_types.py b/pystencils/data_types.py
index 6bae2da..532a933 100644
--- a/pystencils/data_types.py
+++ b/pystencils/data_types.py
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ class TypedSymbol(sp.Symbol):
if np.issubdtype(self.dtype.numpy_dtype, np.unsignedinteger):
return False
- return super().is_positive
+ return super().is_negative
@property
def is_nonnegative(self):
--
GitLab