Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • hyteg hyteg
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Planning hierarchy
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 33
    • Issues 33
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 2
    • Merge requests 2
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • hyteg
  • hyteghyteg
  • Merge requests
  • !295

Merged
Created Jan 07, 2020 by Marcus Mohr@mohrDeveloper

Elementwise operators

  • Overview 1
  • Commits 24
  • Pipelines 1
  • Changes 33

Hi,

this is a new attempt to have elementwise operators, i.e. operators that do not work with a stencil-based paradigm, but employ the local element matrices directly. Thus, the apply() will compute the effect of multiplying the element local DoFs with the local element matrix. Currently by setting the latter up, but in the future could also use the technique of Kronbichler et al.

This new attempt implements a P1ElementwiseOperator and a P2ElementwiseOperator for 2D and 3D. So far we can only apply the operator and perform Jacobi smoothing.

Cheers
Marcus

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: mohr/ElementwiseOperators-mergeCandidate