Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • lbmpy lbmpy
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 17
    • Issues 17
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 4
    • Merge requests 4
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • pycodegen
  • lbmpylbmpy
  • Merge requests
  • !99

Shan-Chen tutorial fixes

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Alexander Reinauer requested to merge alexander.reinauer/lbmpy:tutorial_fixes into master Oct 15, 2021
  • Overview 7
  • Commits 7
  • Pipelines 3
  • Changes 4

I included the changes i made to the tutorial during the espresso summer school to make it momentum conserving. The comparison with the reference data is now done after 1000 timesteps for the two-component version and also only done up to an error of 1e-4. The reason is that there is a difference in the velocity-calculation using the Guo-force correction, the reference implementation always uses the current force whereas this notebook uses the old force value. I might be wrong here but the version from this notebook seems more physical to me.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: tutorial_fixes